[This year the disappearance day of Sri Baladeva Vidyabhusana is in
June 6th in America. The transcription below is being published for
the first time today.]
Today is the disappearance day of Sri Baladeva Vidyabhusana - one
of the most elevated acaryas in our disciplic succession. Today is
also the birthday of Srimati Gangamata Gosvamini, and it is also the
very day that the Ganges River came to this world. Three holy days
are here. In India, in all our Mathas (temples), there will be a very
big festival of harikatha for these prominent leaders in devotion
to Sri Krsna.
Baladeva Vidyabhusana was born in Orissa, near Puri, in a place called
Chilka Lake. He was very brilliant, and in his boyhood he learned
all vyakarana (Sanskrit grammar) as well as the Vedas, Upanisads and
all other scriptures. He wanted especially to read and study Vedanta.
He read Sri Sankaracarya's explanation of Vedanta, but he was not
satisfied and wanted to study more. Therefore, he went to South India,
to a place called Udupi, where he studied all the commentaries on
Vedanta, like the Sri-bhasya of Sri Ramanuja, the Parijata-Saurabha-bhasya
of Sri Nimbaditya, more of the Sariraka-bhasya of Sri Sankaracarya,
the Sarvajna-Sukti-bhasya of Sri Visnusvami, the Brhad-bhasya and
Anubhasya of Sri Madhvacarya, and the Bhaskara-bhasya of Sri Bhaskara
Acarya. He became very learned, and after that he returned to his
homeland with a desire to conquer the entire world - to free it of
misunderstandings in philosophical tattva.
He went to Jagannatha Puri, and he thought, "Previously, Sarvabhauma
Bhattacarya and many others like him have been here, so there must
be so many learned persons in their line. I will conquer and defeat
them." At that time there was a Gaudiya-Vaisnava present, named
Radha-Damodara Prabhu, who was in the line of, and just after, Syamananda
Prabhu, Rasikananda Prabhu, and Nayananda Prabhu. Radha-Damodara Prabhu
was a very good scholar. He was very learned, but he kept all his
knowledge hidden. He was a very simple person, always chanting and
remembering in the line of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Srila Rupa
Gosvami. One day Baladeva Vidyabhusana came to defeat him, but when
he heard all his siddhanta (conclusive truths) he thought, "I
am very insignificant and I do not know anything in front of him.
I am like a baby, a small baby." He at once surrendered to the
lotus feet of Radha-Damodara and took initiation from him.
After that he went to Vrndavana and took shelter of his siksa-guru,
Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, and he totally surrendered to
him. There he read all of Srila Jiva Gosvami's Six Sandarbhas: Tattva-sandarbha,
Paramatma-sandharbha, Bhagavat-sandarbha, Krsna-sandarbha, Bhakti-sandarbha,
and Prtti-sandarbha.
Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura had taken ksetra-sannyasa. Ksetra-sannyasa
means that one lives either in Vraja-dhama, Navadvipa-dhama or Jagannatha
Puri-dhama and takes a vow: "I will not leave this place."
Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura had taken ksetra-sannyasa in Vrndavana-dhama.
He had decided, "I will never go out of Vrndavana." Gradually,
he reached the old age of one-hundred years, and at that time there
was some quarrel:
Some of the members of the Ramanuja Sampradaya, which propounds vaidhi-bhakti
and varnasrama dharma, challenged, "How is it that Srimati Radhika,
although not married to Krsna, always sits with Krsna? It is illegal."
That was the first question. Second: "There is no mention of
the name Radhika in Srimad-Bhagavatam or in any other sastra."
And third: "The Gaudiya Vaisnavas are not in any Vaisnava sampradaya.
There are only four sampradayas: Sri-Laksmi-sampradaya, Brahma-sampradaya,
Rudra-sampradaya and Sanaka-sampradaya. In Kali-yuga there are four
prominent acaryas: Ramanuja in the Sri-sampradaya, Madhvacarya in
the Brahma-sampradaya, Visnusvami in the Rudra-sampradaya and Nimbaditya
in the Sanaka-sampradaya. From where did these Gaudiya Vaisnavas recently
come? We don't accept them. They have no commentary on Vedanta-sutra,
so we cannot accept that they know siddhanta. We cannot accept their
philosophical conclusions."
The King of Jaipura requested Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura
to come, but he denied their request. He ordered his disciple Baladeva
Vidyabhusana Prabhu to go in his stead. Baladeva Vidyabhusana Prabhu
went there, together with another prominent disciple of Srila Visvanatha
Cakravarti Thakura, and defeated all. He quoted many Puranas, Vedas,
Upanisads and the Srimad-Bhagavatam, proving that Srimati Radhika
and Lord Sri Krsna are always together. Radhika is Krsna's potency
or power - They cannot be separated.
Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana quoted a story from Srila Jayadeva Gosvami's
Gita-govinda that showed how Radhika was married to Krsna. He also
quoted the history from Srimad Bhagavatam wherein Lord Brahma stole
all the cowherd boys and calves, and Krsna Himself became exact duplicates
of all the boys. According to the Bhagavatam, that year Gargacarya
announced that all the cowherd men should give in their daughters
in marriage, because it was a very auspicious year. In that year,
therefore, all the daughters were married to all the sons of the cowherd
men. Actually, though, because the young cowherd boys were Krsna Himself,
all the girls were married to Krsna.
Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana Prabhu presented some verses from Srimad-Bhagavatam:
anayaradhito nunam
bhagavan harir isvarah
yan no vihaya govindah
prito yam anayad rahah
["Certainly this particular gopi has perfectly worshiped the
all-powerful Personality of Godhead, Govinda, since He was so pleased
with Her that He abandoned the rest of us and brought Her to a secluded
place." (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.30.28)]
There are so many verses substantiating the truth of Sri Sri Radha
and Krsna. Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana Prabhu quoted them all, and
he proved that Radhika is Sri Krsna's own power - for Them there is
no need to marry. The followers of the Ramanuja-sampradaya accepted
these arguments. They were bound to accept; they were defeated.
The opposing party then said, "You have no bona fide Vaisnava
sampradaya." Baladeva Vidyabhusana then proved the Gaudiya Vaisnavas
are in the line of Sri Madhvacarya. Sri Laksmipati Tirtha, who gave
diksa to Sri Nityananda Prabhu, was a disciple of Sri Madhvacarya.
Sri Madhavendra Puripada, the grand spiritual master of Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu, was also a disciple of this Laksmipati Tirtha.
The followers of the Ramanuja sampradaya challenged, "Laksmipati
Tirtha was 'Tirtha' and Madhavendra Puri was 'Puri.' How did this
difference come?
Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana clearly explained that one cannot decide
a person's disciplic succession on the basis of sannyasa. Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu was initiated by Sri Isvari Puripada at Gaya, and in Vaisnava
siddhanta He followed Isvara Puripada. He did not follow Kesava Bharati,
who gave Him sannyasa. The Guru is he who initiates by mantra - harinama
and diksa-mantra. Sri Isvara Puripada gave Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu
the gopal-mantra, and Mahaprabhu followed Vaisnava religion according
to the mood of Isvara Puripada, in the line of Madhavendra Puripada.
In the same way, although Srila Madhavendra Puri received sannyasa
from someone else, he was initiated into the gopal-mantra by Sri Laksmipati
Tirtha. There was a householder devotee at that time, who took sannyasa
from someone in the Sankara-sampradaya, just as Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu
did. Like Mahaprabhu, he was Vaisnava, not a mayavadi. That Vaisnava
was named Visnu Puri, and he had been initiated in the Madhva-sampradaya.
Madhavendra Puri took sannyasa from that Puri - from Visnu Puri. In
this way, Gaudiya Vaisnavas are part of the Madhva-sampradaya.
Nowadays, there is a similar friction in Vrndavana and Navadvipa.
One party is saying, "We, Gaudiya Vaisnavas, are not under any
Vaisnava sampradaya. We are fully independent. Why should Caitanya
Mahaprabhu take shelter of any other sampradaya? He is Krsna Himself."
This argument is not correct. Sri Krsna accepted Sandipani Muni and
Lord Ramacandra accepted Vasistha as their Gurus. The duty of a sampradaya-guru
is not the job of Lord Krsna. Sampradayas are established by His powers
and associates. Laksmi, Brahma, Visnusvami and Nimbaditya all are
His associates. If Krsna were the head of the sampradaya, it would
be called Krsna-sampradaya or Narayana-sampradaya - not Brahma-sampradaya.
The names of all the sampradayas refer to the names of devotees: Sri-sampradaya,
Brahma-sampradaya, Ramanuja-sampradaya and Madhva-sampradaya.
Nowadays, that party says that Gaudiya Vaisnavas are a separate and
fully independent sampradaya. But Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Srila
Jiva Gosvami, and before that Srila Gopala-bhatta Gosvami and Sri
Kavi-karnapura, have accepted the Madhva-sampradaya. So we must also
accept the Madhva-sampradaya, as Sri Baladeva Vidyabhusana has written
in his books.
That party says that Baladeva Vidyabhusana went to Udupi, the place
of Madhvacarya, and that he accepted the Madhva-sampradaya. They say
his initiation was in the Madhva-sampradaya. They say that he later
came in the association of Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, but
he never accepted Gaudiya Vaisnavism, and that is why he said that
Gaudiya Vaisnavas are in the Madhva line.
This idea is totally wrong. If Baladeva Vidyabhusana was not in our
Gaudiya Vaisnava line, how could he have explained all the sandarbhas
of Srila Jiva Gosvami? He accepted Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu as non-different
from Sri Krsna. All his books are in our line - in the line of Srila
Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura. He also explained Srila Rupa Gosvami's
Laghu-bhagavatamrta, as well all the books of Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti
Thakura and the other books of Srila Rupa Gosvami. He was a Rupanuga
Vaisnava.
If Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana had not been present at that time,
our Gaudiya Vaisnava identity would have disappeared from this world.
He established all the principles and philosophy established by Caitanya
Mahaprabhu. He is a true Gaudiya Vaisnava.
For about one hundred years, Smartas have been raising this question,
but Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Srila Prabhupada Bhaktisiddanta Sarasvati
Thakura and all other great acaryas have defeated all their arguments.
Our Guru Maharaja has very boldly written a book about this. I want
to publish it, with so many notes and explanations. Very soon I will
publish it. [This book was later published under the name
Prabandha-Panchakam.
So Sri Baladeva Vidyabhusana prabhu is a very prominent person in
our line. There are so many more things to tell; but time is going
to be over, so I'm ending here.
Editorial Advisors: Sripad Madhava Maharaja and Sripad Brajanath dasa
Editor: Syamarani dasi
Transcriber: Janaki dasi
Typist: Anita dasi
Proofreader: Krsna Kamini dasi