Today is the auspicious day of the Ganga (Ganges
River) coming to this world. Who is Ganga? Ganga has two forms. One
form is coming from the lotus feet of Lord Vamanadeva.
*
[See endnote 1]His lotus feet were worshipped
by Lord Brahma, who washed them in the water of the Causal Ocean. Brahma
placed that water in his kamandalu (water pot), and from there King
Bhagiratha brought it to this world.
* [See endnote 2] [Bhagiratha was
the king who performed austerities to bring the Ganges to Earth, to
save his ancestors.]
There is another history, which is in the Brahma-vaivarta Purana.
Ganga is a sakhi, a gopi like Lalita, Visakha, Srimati Radhika, Candravali
and others like them. One day Sri Krsna was sitting with Ganga-sakhi,
and He was engaged in some pleasant talks. In the meantime Srimati
Radhika came and saw them, and She thought, "Oh, Krsna is meeting
with Ganga-sakhi?"
Lord Krsna became ashamed and Ganga also became ashamed. She melted
and became water, and Krsna did as well. This ashamed Ganga became
water, and one drop of that water became the Viraja River (Causal
Ocean) - the dividing line between Vaikuntha and this material world.
Karanodakasayi Visnu is sleeping in that Ocean, and Laksmi-devi is
massaging Him.
This can be compared with Sri Sri Radha-Krsna's pastimes at Prema-sarovara
in Vrndavana. Do you know this pastime? Both Srimati Radhika and Krsna
became Prema-sarovara.
* [See endnote 3] Ganga-sakhi melted in this
way - she also remained present in her transcendental body.
So one drop became Viraja, wherein Karanodaksayi Visnu resides. Then,
when Lord Vamanadeva's foot reached Brahma-loka, Lord Brahma took
some water from that Causal Ocean and washed the lotus feet of Vamanadeva.
That bathing water then became the River Ganges in this world. On
Earth the Ganges is called Bhagirathi, in heaven, Mandakini, and in
Patal-loka, Bhogavati. Thus, this Ganga (Ganges) is Ganga-sakhi also.
Certain people say that if Ganges is the foot water of Lord Krsna
as Lord Vamanadeva, how can we then offer it to Krsna or Narayana
or any other deity? They say that one cannot offer foot water in their
worship to anyone. This is a wrong idea. Lord Sri Krsna's feet, head,
eyes, and so on are all the same. Krsna's remnants are also Krsna.
maha-prasade govinde nama-brahmani vaisnave
svalpa-punyavatam rajan visvaso naiva jayate
["Persons who are not very highly elevated in pious activities
cannot believe in the remnants of food of the Supreme Personality
of Godhead, nor in Govinda, the holy name of the Lord, nor in the
Vaisnavas." (Skanda Purana)]
What is the meaning? All these are Krsna.
If someone is taking maha-prasadam, and he is thinking that by taking
maha-prasadam he has now become impure, this means he has no faith
in maha-prasadam. We should not think like this. A devotee like Srila
Sukadeva Gosvami will not wash himself after he has taken maha-prasadam.
Rather, he will smear it over his body with his hands and think, "Oh
I am so fortunate to receive maha-prasadam. Of course we should not
do this; we cannot imitate the maha-bhagavata.
Kanistha-adhikaris have some doubt. They think, "How can we enter
Thakuraji's mandira (temple) and offer Him foodstuffs unless we wash
first?" We know that these are remnants of Krsna, but remnants
of Krsna are also Krsna. You should come in this stage - believe in
this way. Of course, if you are not at this stage, you should wash
your hands and then go to the temple. At the same time, never think,
"I have become impure."
The water of Ganga can be placed in the abhisheka (bathing water)
of Krsna. It can be poured on the head of Krsna, and it can also be
offered to Him as a drink - no harm. In Jagannatha Puri, the smarta-brahmanas
* [See endnote 4] never offer the water of the Ganga to Lord Jagannatha.
This is because they are smarta. They are offensive to Lord Krsna's
lotus feet. They have dug a well near the Jagannatha Puri temple,
and all water for worship is supplied from that well - not from Ganga.
If anyone brings Ganga water, the smarta priests will not give it
to Thakurji, the deity. We don't think like smarta-brahmanas; we are
bhaktas - devotees.
"Maha-prasade govinde, nama, brahmana vaisnave." All these
- maha-prasada, pure Vaisnavas, pure brahmanas, the holy name - are
Sri Krsna Himself; they are not different, but there are some specialities
in each. The Maha-prasadam remnants of Krsna are more powerful than
Krsna Himself. Vaisnavas are also more powerful than Krsna Himself.
Krsna cannot come to us. We cannot see Him, but we can see Vaisnavas.
Vaisnavas are the embodiment of the full mercy of Krsna. Krsna has
to follow some rules and regulations, so that He can come to us or
so that we can see Him, but Vaisnavas and maha-prasadam are causelessly
merciful.
"Maha prasade govinde, Nama." Lord Sri Krsna's holy names
are more powerful than Krsna Himself. He has invested all His power
therein.
namnam akari bahudha nija sarva sakti
tatrarpita niyamitah smarane na kalah
etadrsi tava krpa bhagavan mamapi
durdaivam idrsam ihajani nanuragah
["My Lord, O Supreme Personality of Godhead, in Your holy name
there is all good fortune for the living entity, and therefore You
have many names, such as "Krsna" and "Govinda,"
by which You expand Yourself. You have invested all Your potencies
in those names, and there are no hard and fast rules for remembering
them. My dear Lord, although You bestow such mercy upon the fallen,
conditioned souls by liberally teaching Your holy names, I am so unfortunate
that I commit offenses while chanting the holy name, and therefore
I do not achieve attachment for chanting." (Siksastaka verse
2)]
Krsna has to think, "What is the proper time to give My darsana
to (anyone)? What is the proper qualification (anyone) must have in
order to receive My darsana? However, Nama-deva (the personality of
Sri Krsna's holy names) comes even to offenders. Anyone can chant
Krsna's holy name, day or night, having taking bath or not. Even while
someone is passing stool, he can chant Sri Krsna's name. We cannot
take darsana of Krsna or worship Him in an impure state, but the holy
name and maha-prasadam are causelessly merciful. We should think like
this.
Now it is eight pm, so we will end here. Starting tomorrow, we will
explain Bhakti-tattva Viveka in the mornings and Sri Caitanya Caritamrta
in the evenings.
[*Endnote 1: [from Srila Narayana Maharaja's Australia
2000 lecture on Gangamata Thakurani:"When Sri Vamanadeva took the
universe away from Bali Maharaja, His lotus foot went through the universal
covering and touched the Causal Ocean. A drop of that Causal Ocean thus
came into the universe as the Ganges."]
[*Endnote 2: The following is excerpts from the Chapter
Summaries of Srimad-Bhagavatam, Ninth Canto (Chapters 8 and 9)
"Once, a king called Sagara performed an asvamedha sacrifice,
but the horse needed for such a sacrifice was stolen by Indra, the
King of heaven. The king and his sons searched for the horse. In the
course of this search, the sons of the king came upon the great personality
Kapiladeva and thought Him to have stolen the horse. With this offensive
understanding, they attacked Him and were all burned to ashes. The
king's grandson, called Amsuman, later searched for the horse and
delivered his uncles.
"Upon approaching Kapiladeva, Amsuman saw both the horse meant
for sacrifice and a pile of ashes. Amsuman offered prayers to Kapiladeva,
who was very pleased by his prayers and who returned the horse. After
getting back the horse, however, Amsuman still stood before Kapiladeva,
and Kapiladeva could understand that Amsuman was praying for the deliverance
of his forefathers. Thus Kapiladeva offered the instruction that they
could be delivered by water from the Ganges.
"The son of Maharaja Amsuman was Dilipa, who tried to bring the
Ganges to this world but who died without success. Bhagiratha, the
son of Dilipa, was determined to bring the Ganges to the material
world, and for this purpose he underwent severe austerities. Mother
Ganges, being fully satisfied by his austerities, made herself visible
to him, wanting to give him a benediction. Bhagiratha then asked her
to deliver his forefathers. Although Mother Ganges agreed to come
down to Earth, she made two conditions: first, she wanted some suitable
male to be able to control her waves; second, although all sinful
men would be freed from sinful reactions by bathing in the Ganges,
Mother Ganges did not want to keep all these sinful reactions. These
two conditions were subject matters for consideration. Bhagiratha
replied to Mother Ganges, 'The Personality of Godhead Lord Siva will
be completely able to control the waves of your water, and when pure
devotees bathe in your water, the sinful reactions left by sinful
men will be counteracted.'
"Bhagiratha then performed austerities to satisfy Lord Siva,
who is called Asutosa because he is naturally satisfied very easily.
Lord Siva agreed to Bhagiratha's proposal to check the force of the
Ganges. In this way, simply by the touch of the Ganges, Bhagiratha's
forefathers were delivered and allowed to go to the heavenly planets."(Excerpts
form summary of Srimad Bhagavatam chapter 9.8 and 9.9)]
["That original Personality of Godhead, named Sankarsana, first
lies down in the river Viraja, which serves as a border between the
material and the spiritual world. As Karanabdhisayi Visnu, He is the
original cause of the material creation. (Caitanya-caritamrta, Madhya-lila
20.268)]
[*Endnote 3: Once, Radha and Krisna, surrounded by
Lalita and the other sakhis, were immersed in various kinds of loving
pastimes (premaya lila-vilasa) when a bumblebee hovered around the beautiful
lotus face of Srimati Radhika. Thinking Her face to be a lotus flower,
the bee wanted to sit there and drink its nectar; it therefore continued
to hover around Her face. Srimatiji became afraid and covered Her face
with Her palms. She also tried to chase the bee away, but to no avail.
Madhumangala saw Srimati Radhika's distress and chased the bumble bee
far away with his stick. Upon his return, he announced, "I have
chased madhusudana far away from here. He has gone and will not return."
When Srimati Radhika heard Madhumangala's words, She at once thought
that Madhusudana Krisna had gone away and had left Her, although She
was sitting directly in Krisna's lap. She began to lament, deeply afflicted
by separation from Him. She could not at that instant understand that
madhusudana also means 'bumble bee'. She wept and repeatedly cried out,
"Ha Prananatha! Where have You gone? Ha Prananatha! Where have
You gone?"
Upon seeing this amazing bhava, called prema vaicittya, in His beloved
Radhika, Krisna also forgot that She was sitting in His lap. He too
wept and cried, "Ha Priye!" The tears that flowed from Their
eyes and the perspiration that flowed from Their bodies created this
pond, after which Radha and Krisna both fainted. When the sakhis saw
Them in this state, they too became senseless. Srimati's sarika then
began to loudly chant Sri Radha's name, and the suka began to loudly
chant Sri Krisna's name. As Their names entered Their ears, Radha
and Krisna regained external consciousness and gazed upon each other
with great yearning. Gradually, the sakhis also regained consciousness
in unlimited bliss and began to call out, Jaya! Jaya! The poet Sri
Madhuriji describes this lila in a very charming way.
After this incident, Sri Krisna thought to Himself, "Although
I remain close by My beloved Srimati Radhika, I am unable to pacify
the suffering She experiences in separation. The heat of impending
separation constantly scorches her, and I see no means to console
Her. When I am far away from Her, She constantly thinks of Me out
of separation. She becomes so absorbed in bhava that She laughingly
talks to tamala trees, thinking them to be Me, and plays with Her
sakhis. Sometimes She also displays mana. In contrast, when I am nearby,
a feeling of separation from Me overcomes Her, and She becomes distressed
and cries. In this condition, I am unable to console Her, even when
I am right beside Her.
"Thus, Sri Radha can be consoled only by My being far away from
Her. In this state of separation, Her fire of separation can be somewhat
pacified upon seeing My sphurti or beholding objects like the tamala
tree that possess a luster similar to My own. This is because She
actually considers them to be Her Priyatama." Thinking in this
way, Krisna secretly decided to leave for a distant place. This is
the main reason why He left Vrindavana to go to Mathura and Dvaraka.
The bhava that Srimati Radhika displays here is the topmost madana
bhava, and is found only in Her. It does not manifest even in Lalita
and the other sakhis. In this madana bhava, feelings of both vipralambha
(separation) and sambhoga (meeting), as well as all other mutually
opposed bhavas, are present simultaneously in an astonishing way.
(Vraja Mandala Parikrama book)]
[*Endnote 4: "SarvabhaSarvabhauma Bhattacarya was previously
a smarta-brahmana-that is, one who strictly follows the Vedic principles
on the mundane platform. On the mundane platform one cannot believe
that prasada is transcendental, that Govinda is the original form
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or that a Vaisnava is a liberated
person. These transcendental considerations are out of the ordinary
Vedic scholar's jurisdiction. Most Vedic scholars are called Vedantists.
These so-called followers of Vedanta philosophy consider the Absolute
Truth to be impersonal. They also believe that a person born in a
particular caste cannot change his caste until he dies and takes rebirth.
The smarta-brahmanas also reject the fact that maha-prasada (food
offered to the Deity) is transcendental and materially uncontaminated.
Originally, Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya was subjected to all the rules
and regulations of the Vedic principles on the mundane platform. Now
Gopinatha Acarya pointed out how Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya had been
converted by the causeless mercy of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Being
converted, Sarvabhauma partook of prasada with the Vaisnavas. Indeed,
he sat by the side of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu." (Sri Caitanya-caritamrta
Madhya-lila 12.180 purport.)
"A smarta-brahmana is always interested in material profit, whereas
a Vaisnava is interested only in satisfying the Supreme Personality
of Godhead." (Srimad-Bhagavatam 8.9.33)]
Editorial Advisors: Sripad Madhava Maharaja and Sripad Brajanatha
dasa
Editor: Syamarani dasi
Transcriber: Janaki dasi
Typist: Anita dasi